We’re starting to feel like Bill Murray’s Phil Connor in Groundhog Day, waking up to the sounds of Sonny & Cher every morning. Previously, only Labour had been accused of changing their minds over HIPs, but it seems the same story all over again, with the Conservatives exhibiting the same vagueness of direction when it comes to their future. As we describe below, the opposition are learning that anything to do with property is always more complex than it might first appear. The confident November tone of “we’ll scrap HIPs in weeks” has been replaced with a rather more subdued December mumble of “we’ll scrap them in 100 days … after a consultation … and a new piece of legislation”. Despite this repeated HIPs uncertainty, we wish all our readers a happy Christmas break in preparation for what looks like being a very busy start to 2010 and for all your support during 2009.
Conservative plans for HIPs at risk of derailing?
Despite promises from the shadow housing minister to scrap HIPs immediately upon their election, the fact that the Conservatives have acknowledged that a consultation is required is raising doubt about their ability to carry out their plans for HIPs. Notwithstanding concerns about the increase in unemployment that they will cause (estimates range from about 5,000 to 20,000) the legal minefield they are walking into is challenging. Their claim to require only secondary legislation (a statutory instrument) is problematic as the law they are trying to change is actually primary legislation. Indeed, the mechanism they were hoping to use can be likened more to a train’s “Emergency Alarm” rather than a “Power Off” button on a TV remote control – in other words, there must be concerns about striking a car stuck on a level crossing, rather than just a disliking for X-Factor.
The Partnership joins the HIP Reform Group
We have always distanced ourselves from pressure groups and trade associations, as we find their often highly-polarised positions do not match our views. However, based on the increasingly positive feedback from agents concerning elements of the HIPs, we have signed up to the HIP Reform Group who are looking at ways to improve the contents of HIPs. We share agent’s concerns about the delays caused by the lack of first day marketing, and question the wisdom of allowing variable-quality local authority searches in the HIP. We believe that the HIP Reform Group is a very positive step forward to improving the house buying process, and hopefully avoiding throwing the baby out with the Conservative’s bathwater.
Referral Fees – concerns broaden to conveyancing
Further to our concerns about the referral fees being paid by HIP providers to agents that are not declared to their clients, it appears that conveyancers are now coming under similar scrutiny by the Legal Services Consumer Panel. As we do not approve of referral fees for either our HIP service or our new conveyancing service, this increased exposure by regulatory and advisory bodies are a welcome change from the ambivalence that has appeared to be the case up until now.
